Real Ear Measurement: Why It Matters for Accurate Hearing Aid Fittings

Hearing care professional explaining hearing aid fitting verification to an older patient, demonstrating a streamlined and automated fitting workflow.

At a Glance: Real ear measurement (REM) is an objective test that measures the actual sound level a hearing aid delivers inside a patient’s ear canal. It allows an audiologist or hearing instrument specialist to verify that amplification levels match prescriptive targets for each individual’s hearing loss and ear canal anatomy.

Every person’s ear canal has a unique shape and size, which changes how sound travels and can be perceived. Without real ear verification, hearing aid settings rely on pre-programmed manufacturer defaults designed for typical hearing loss patterns rather than the individual wearer. Both the American Academy of Audiology (AAA) and the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), and in the UK, the British Academy of Audiology (BAA) and British Society of Audiology (BSA) all recommend real ear measurement as the preferred method for verifying hearing aid performance. Yet research suggests that only about 30% of hearing care providers use REM consistently.

What Is Real Ear Measurement?

Real ear measurement is a precise measurement technique used during a hearing aid fitting. Here’s how it works:

  • A thin, flexible probe tube connected to a probe microphone is placed inside the patient’s ear canal, close to the tympanic membrane (eardrum)
  • A speaker delivers different sounds at various volume levels
  • The REM system records exactly how the hearing aid responds inside that ear

The measurement captures the exact sound level being delivered to the ear, not an estimate. This gives the audiologist objective data to compare the hearing instrument’s output against the prescriptive target set for that patient’s hearing loss.

REM vs. Manufacturer First Fit

When a hearing aid is programmed through manufacturer programming software, it uses average ear canal dimensions and generalized algorithms to set initial amplification. This is called a “first fit.” Research published in the Journal of the American Academy of Audiology has shown that first-fit settings commonly underfit by 7 to 10 dB compared to prescriptive targets, particularly in the higher frequencies where speech clarity depends most.

Real ear verification closes that gap. By measuring what’s actually happening inside the patient’s ear canal, clinicians can adjust hearing aid settings until the output matches the prescribed target within 1.5 to 2.5 dB.

 

How the REM Process Works

The REM process follows a series of steps during the hearing aid fitting appointment.

 

5 steps of Real ear measurement

 

Step 1: Otoscopic Examination

Before probe tube placement, the hearing care provider examines the ear with an otoscope. This confirms there’s no excessive earwax or debris that could interfere with the measurement.

 

Step 2: Probe Tube Placement

A thin silicone probe tube is inserted into the patient’s ear canal, typically positioned within 5 mm of the tympanic membrane. Accurate probe tube placement is a must because the position of the tube directly affects the accuracy of the measurement.

 

Step 3: Baseline Measurement (REUG)

With the probe microphone in place and no hearing aid inserted, the clinician runs a Real Ear Unaided Gain (REUG) measurement. This captures how the patient’s ear canal naturally amplifies sound based on its unique shape and volume, documenting those individual differences.

 

Step 4: Aided Measurements

The hearing aid is inserted alongside the probe tube. The REM system then plays different sounds at multiple input levels:

  • 50 dB (soft speech)
  • 65 dB (average conversation)
  • 80 dB (loud speech)

The system records the hearing aid’s output at each level and displays it against the prescriptive target on screen.

 

Step 5: Adjustments and Verification

The audiologist makes real-time adjustments through the programming software until the hearing instrument’s output closely matches the target for each frequency and input level. The process also confirms that loud sounds stay within a comfortable range, protecting the patient from over-amplification.

 

Common REM Tests and What They Measure

Test What It Measures
REUG (Real Ear Unaided Gain) The ear canal’s natural resonance without a hearing aid in place
REOG (Real Ear Occluded Gain) The effect of the hearing aid shell or earmold in the ear with the device turned off; includes measure of the occluded ear
REAR (Real Ear Aided Response) The actual sound level delivered by the hearing aid at the tympanic membrane
Speech Mapping Uses speech or speech-like signals to show how the hearing aid processes real-world speech across frequencies

 

Why Real Ear Measurement Matters for Patient Outcomes

The evidence supporting REM is clear. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in Trends in Hearing found that probe-tube verification of real ear hearing aid amplification improved self-perceived listening ability, communication outcomes, and understanding of speech in background noise.

Specific findings from current research include:

  • REM-verified fittings matched prescriptive targets within 1.5 to 2.5 dB, while manufacturer default settings were underfit by 7 to 10 dB
  • Patients with REM-verified hearing aids showed a significant improvement in word recognition scores at conversational volume levels (50 dB and 65 dB)
  • 76% of patients fitted with REM achieved above-average success after just one or two visits, compared to 53% of patients without REM who needed four to six visits
  • Hearing aid users fitted with real ear measures were more likely to keep their devices long-term, reducing return rates

Fewer return visits, better speech clarity, and higher device retention rates all point to the value of including REM as a standard part of the hearing aid fitting process.

 

Real ear measurement statistics

 

Why Each Patient’s Ear Canal Matters

No two ear canals are the same. The length, diameter, and unique shape of each ear canal affect how sound travels to the tympanic membrane. Even a patient’s left and right ears will differ in their acoustic properties.

These physical differences mean that:

  • A hearing aid programmed for “average” ear dimensions may over-amplify or under-amplify for specific ears
  • The natural resonance of the ear canal changes how the hearing instrument delivers sound at different frequencies
  • Earmold type, venting, and hearing aid style all interact with the ear’s anatomy, further influencing aid performance

Real ear measurement accounts for all of these variables. It gives the clinician a window into what is actually happening at the eardrum, rather than relying on predictions based on population averages.

Speech Mapping and Verifying Advanced Features

Speech mapping is a form of REM that uses real or recorded speech signals instead of pure tone beeps. It shows how the hearing aid processes actual speech patterns, giving clinicians and patients a visual representation of hearing aid performance across frequencies.

Why speech mapping is useful:

  • Many patients find it easier to understand than traditional audiometric displays
  • It serves as a counseling tool during the fitting, helping patients see how their hearing aid responds to real speech
  • It can demonstrate the difference between aided and unaided hearing in a way that builds patient confidence

REM also allows clinicians to verify advanced features like noise reduction algorithms and directional microphones. Without real ear verification, there is no objective way to confirm these features are working as intended in the patient’s ear.

What Patients Should Expect During REM

For the hearing aid user, real ear measurement is a quick and comfortable process. Most patients describe the probe tube as a slight tickle inside the ear. The entire process typically takes 10 to 15 minutes per ear.

During the appointment, patients can expect:

  • A brief otoscopic exam to check the ear canal
  • Placement of a thin probe tube alongside the hearing aid
  • Short bursts of different sounds played through a speaker
  • Real-time adjustments to hearing aid settings based on the measured results
  • A visual display (in speech mapping) showing how the hearing aid responds to different sounds

The process addresses each patient’s unique needs and gives the hearing care provider objective data to support the fitting.

Audiologist explaining real ear measurement results using Aurical FreeFit system.

Getting the Most from Every Hearing Aid FittingĀ 

Real ear measurement gives clinicians the objective data they need to deliver personalized, evidence-based hearing aid fittings. By measuring the actual sound level inside a patient’s ear canal, REM accounts for individual differences in ear anatomy, verifies that amplification levels match prescriptive targets, and confirms that the hearing instrument is performing as intended.

Natus Sensory supports this best practice through the AuricalĀ® portfolio of fitting systems, which integrates real ear measurement, verification, and counseling into a single workflow powered by OtosuiteĀ® software. These systems are designed with clinicians in mind, supporting accurate, repeatable fittings that improve patient outcomes. To learn more about how Natus Sensory’s hearing aid fitting solutions can support your clinic, contact us today.

Sources:

  1. American Academy of Audiology Task Force Committee. (2006). Guidelines for the audiologic management of adult hearing impairment. Audiology Today, 18(5), 32-36.
  2. Mueller, H. G., & Picou, E. M. (2010). Survey examines popularity of real-ear probe-microphone measures. The Hearing Journal, 63(5), 27-28. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000373447.52956.25
  3. Amlani, A. M., Pumford, J., & Gessling, E. (2017). Real-ear measurement and its impact on aided audibility and patient loyalty. Hearing Review, 23(12), 12-20.
  4. Valente, M., Oeding, K., Brockmeyer, A., Smith, S., & Kallogjeri, D. (2018). Differences in word and phoneme recognition in quiet, sentence recognition in noise, and subjective outcomes between manufacturer first-fit and hearing aids programmed to NAL-NL2 using real-ear measures. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 29(8), 706-721.
  5. Almufarrij, I., Dillon, H., & Munro, K. J. (2021). Does probe-tube verification of real-ear hearing aid amplification characteristics improve outcomes in adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends in Hearing, 25, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216521999563
  6. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Value of audiologists during the hearing aid fitting process: Real ear measurement. www.asha.org/siteassets/ebp/dov/value-of-audiologists-during-hearing-aid-fitting-process-real-ear-measurement.pdf
  7. Kochkin, S., Beck, D. L., Christensen, L. A., Compton-Conley, C., Fligor, B. J., Kricos, P. B., & Turner, R. G. (2010). MarkeTrak VIII: The impact of the hearing healthcare professional on hearing aid user success. The Hearing Review, 17(4), 12-34.
  8. Abrams, H. B., Chisolm, T. H., McManus, M., & McArdle, R. (2012). Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: Comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 23(10), 768-778.

053103 RevA